Dec Recommended Practices in Early Intervention/Early Childhood Special Education
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w89081836 →Countries where authors are citing Dec Recommended Practices in Early Intervention/Early Childhood Special Education
This map shows the geographic impact of Dec Recommended Practices in Early Intervention/Early Childhood Special Education. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dec Recommended Practices in Early Intervention/Early Childhood Special Education with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dec Recommended Practices in Early Intervention/Early Childhood Special Education more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Dec Recommended Practices in Early Intervention/Early Childhood Special Education
This network shows the impact of Dec Recommended Practices in Early Intervention/Early Childhood Special Education. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Dec Recommended Practices in Early Intervention/Early Childhood Special Education.
About Dec Recommended Practices in Early Intervention/Early Childhood Special Education
This paper, published in 2000, received 573 indexed citations . Written by Susan R. Sandall, Mary McLean and Barbara J. Smith covering the research area of Clinical Psychology and Developmental and Educational Psychology. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Clinical Psychology (388 citations), Education (285 citations) and Developmental and Educational Psychology (233 citations).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w89081836.