Chemical methods in prokaryotic systematics

806 indexed citations
published 1994

Impact in

Classified as

Journal
Wiley eBooks

In The Last Decade

doi.org/w8751141 →

Countries where authors are citing Chemical methods in prokaryotic systematics

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Chemical methods in prokaryotic systematics. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Chemical methods in prokaryotic systematics with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Chemical methods in prokaryotic systematics more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Chemical methods in prokaryotic systematics

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Chemical methods in prokaryotic systematics. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Chemical methods in prokaryotic systematics.

About Chemical methods in prokaryotic systematics

This paper, published in 1994, received 806 indexed citations . Written by M. Goodfellow and Anthony G. O’Donnell covering the research area of Spectroscopy and Pharmacology. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Molecular Biology (630 citations), Ecology (355 citations), Plant Science (147 citations), Food Science (111 citations) and Pharmacology (94 citations). Published in Wiley eBooks.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/w8751141.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact