Pathology and genetics of tumours of the urinary system and male genital organs
Impact in
- Surgery 396
Classified as
- Authors
- John N. Eble
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w7791318 →Countries where authors are citing Pathology and genetics of tumours of the urinary system and male genital organs
This map shows the geographic impact of Pathology and genetics of tumours of the urinary system and male genital organs. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Pathology and genetics of tumours of the urinary system and male genital organs with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Pathology and genetics of tumours of the urinary system and male genital organs more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Pathology and genetics of tumours of the urinary system and male genital organs
This network shows the impact of Pathology and genetics of tumours of the urinary system and male genital organs. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Pathology and genetics of tumours of the urinary system and male genital organs.
About Pathology and genetics of tumours of the urinary system and male genital organs
This paper, published in 2004, received 806 indexed citations . Written by John N. Eble covering the research area of Molecular Biology, Rheumatology and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (406 citations), Surgery (396 citations), Molecular Biology (383 citations), Oncology (128 citations) and Cancer Research (122 citations).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w7791318.