SAS/STAT guide for personal computers, version 6 edition
Impact in
- Ecology 175
Classified as
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w6479555 →Countries where authors are citing SAS/STAT guide for personal computers, version 6 edition
This map shows the geographic impact of SAS/STAT guide for personal computers, version 6 edition. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by SAS/STAT guide for personal computers, version 6 edition with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites SAS/STAT guide for personal computers, version 6 edition more than expected).
Fields of papers citing SAS/STAT guide for personal computers, version 6 edition
This network shows the impact of SAS/STAT guide for personal computers, version 6 edition. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the SAS/STAT guide for personal computers, version 6 edition.
About SAS/STAT guide for personal computers, version 6 edition
This paper, published in 1985, received 806 indexed citations . covering the research area of Biomedical Engineering. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Ecology (175 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (170 citations), Plant Science (142 citations), Animal Science and Zoology (129 citations) and Global and Planetary Change (98 citations).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w6479555.