Contrasts and Effect Sizes in Behavioral Research: A Correlational Approach

736 indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 1999, received 736 indexed citations. Written by Robert Rosenthal, Ralph L. Rosnow and Donald B. Rubin covering the research area of . It is primarily cited by scholars working on Social Psychology (204 citations), Clinical Psychology (159 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (150 citations). Published in Medical Entomology and Zoology.

In The Last Decade

doi.org/w86420408 →

Countries where authors are citing Contrasts and Effect Sizes in Behavioral Research: A Correlational Approach

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Contrasts and Effect Sizes in Behavioral Research: A Correlational Approach. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Contrasts and Effect Sizes in Behavioral Research: A Correlational Approach with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Contrasts and Effect Sizes in Behavioral Research: A Correlational Approach more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Contrasts and Effect Sizes in Behavioral Research: A Correlational Approach

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Contrasts and Effect Sizes in Behavioral Research: A Correlational Approach. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Contrasts and Effect Sizes in Behavioral Research: A Correlational Approach.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/w86420408.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026