A Cooperative Species: Human Reciprocity and Its Evolution

736 indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 2011, received 736 indexed citations. Written by Samuel Bowles and Herbert Gintis covering the research area of Sociology and Political Science. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Sociology and Political Science (468 citations), Safety Research (243 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (118 citations). Published in RePEc: Research Papers in Economics.

In The Last Decade

doi.org/w5740210 →

Countries where authors are citing A Cooperative Species: Human Reciprocity and Its Evolution

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of A Cooperative Species: Human Reciprocity and Its Evolution. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by A Cooperative Species: Human Reciprocity and Its Evolution with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites A Cooperative Species: Human Reciprocity and Its Evolution more than expected).

Fields of papers citing A Cooperative Species: Human Reciprocity and Its Evolution

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of A Cooperative Species: Human Reciprocity and Its Evolution. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the A Cooperative Species: Human Reciprocity and Its Evolution.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/w5740210.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026