Dialectic of enlightenment : philosophical fragments

736 indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 2002, received 736 indexed citations. Written by Max Horkheimer, Theodor W. Adorno, Gunzelin Schmid Noerr and Edmund Jephcott covering the research area of Sociology and Political Science. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Sociology and Political Science (347 citations), Political Science and International Relations (138 citations) and Philosophy (137 citations). Published in Stanford University Press eBooks.

In The Last Decade

doi.org/w4826781 →

Countries where authors are citing Dialectic of enlightenment : philosophical fragments

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Dialectic of enlightenment : philosophical fragments. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dialectic of enlightenment : philosophical fragments with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dialectic of enlightenment : philosophical fragments more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Dialectic of enlightenment : philosophical fragments

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Dialectic of enlightenment : philosophical fragments. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Dialectic of enlightenment : philosophical fragments.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/w4826781.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026