Midwest Evaluation of the Adult Functioning of Former Foster Youth: outcomes at age 19
- Journal
- PDXScholar (Portland State University)
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w84169664 →Countries where authors are citing Midwest Evaluation of the Adult Functioning of Former Foster Youth: outcomes at age 19
This map shows the geographic impact of Midwest Evaluation of the Adult Functioning of Former Foster Youth: outcomes at age 19. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Midwest Evaluation of the Adult Functioning of Former Foster Youth: outcomes at age 19 with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Midwest Evaluation of the Adult Functioning of Former Foster Youth: outcomes at age 19 more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Midwest Evaluation of the Adult Functioning of Former Foster Youth: outcomes at age 19
This network shows the impact of Midwest Evaluation of the Adult Functioning of Former Foster Youth: outcomes at age 19. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Midwest Evaluation of the Adult Functioning of Former Foster Youth: outcomes at age 19.
About Midwest Evaluation of the Adult Functioning of Former Foster Youth: outcomes at age 19
This paper, published in 2005, received 629 indexed citations . Written by Mark E. Courtney, Amy Dworsky, Thomas E. Keller and Judy Havlicek covering the research area of Demography, Safety Research and Reproductive Medicine. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Safety Research (555 citations), Clinical Psychology (298 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (281 citations). Published in PDXScholar (Portland State University).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w84169664.