Examining TPACK Among K-12 Online Distance Educators in the United States
- Journal
- Contemporary issues in technology and teacher education
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w8411818 →Countries where authors are citing Examining TPACK Among K-12 Online Distance Educators in the United States
This map shows the geographic impact of Examining TPACK Among K-12 Online Distance Educators in the United States. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Examining TPACK Among K-12 Online Distance Educators in the United States with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Examining TPACK Among K-12 Online Distance Educators in the United States more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Examining TPACK Among K-12 Online Distance Educators in the United States
This network shows the impact of Examining TPACK Among K-12 Online Distance Educators in the United States. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Examining TPACK Among K-12 Online Distance Educators in the United States.
About Examining TPACK Among K-12 Online Distance Educators in the United States
This paper, published in 2009, received 384 indexed citations . Written by Leanna Archambault and Kent J. Crippen covering the research area of Information Systems, Sociology and Political Science and Education. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Education (337 citations), Information Systems (129 citations) and Gender Studies (67 citations). Published in Contemporary issues in technology and teacher education.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w8411818.