Comprehension instruction : research-based best practices
- Journal
- Guilford Press eBooks
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w8263539 →Countries where authors are citing Comprehension instruction : research-based best practices
This map shows the geographic impact of Comprehension instruction : research-based best practices. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Comprehension instruction : research-based best practices with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Comprehension instruction : research-based best practices more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Comprehension instruction : research-based best practices
This network shows the impact of Comprehension instruction : research-based best practices. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Comprehension instruction : research-based best practices.
About Comprehension instruction : research-based best practices
This paper, published in 2002, received 733 indexed citations . Written by Cathy Collins Block and Michael Pressley covering the research area of Literature and Literary Theory and Education. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Developmental and Educational Psychology (569 citations), Education (453 citations) and Literature and Literary Theory (97 citations). Published in Guilford Press eBooks.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w8263539.