Funds of Knowledge: Theorizing practices in households, communities, and classrooms.

2.3k indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 2005, received 2.3k indexed citations. Written by Norma González, Luis C. Moll and Cathy Amanti covering the research area of Developmental and Educational Psychology. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Education (1.8k citations), Sociology and Political Science (729 citations) and Linguistics and Language (568 citations). Published in .

In The Last Decade

doi.org/w7739173 →

Countries where authors are citing Funds of Knowledge: Theorizing practices in households, communities, and classrooms.

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Funds of Knowledge: Theorizing practices in households, communities, and classrooms.. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Funds of Knowledge: Theorizing practices in households, communities, and classrooms. with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Funds of Knowledge: Theorizing practices in households, communities, and classrooms. more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Funds of Knowledge: Theorizing practices in households, communities, and classrooms.

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Funds of Knowledge: Theorizing practices in households, communities, and classrooms.. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Funds of Knowledge: Theorizing practices in households, communities, and classrooms..

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/w7739173.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026