Peer Learning in Higher Education : Learning from and with Each Other

314 indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 2014, received 314 indexed citations. Written by David Boud, Ruth Cohen and Jane Sampson covering the research area of . It is primarily cited by scholars working on Education (218 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (60 citations) and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (49 citations). Published in Deakin Research Online (Deakin University).

In The Last Decade

doi.org/w72493933 →

Countries where authors are citing Peer Learning in Higher Education : Learning from and with Each Other

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peer Learning in Higher Education : Learning from and with Each Other. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peer Learning in Higher Education : Learning from and with Each Other with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peer Learning in Higher Education : Learning from and with Each Other more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Peer Learning in Higher Education : Learning from and with Each Other

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Peer Learning in Higher Education : Learning from and with Each Other. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Peer Learning in Higher Education : Learning from and with Each Other.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/w72493933.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026