The hundred languages of children : the Reggio Emilia approach--advanced reflections
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w6720247 →Countries where authors are citing The hundred languages of children : the Reggio Emilia approach--advanced reflections
This map shows the geographic impact of The hundred languages of children : the Reggio Emilia approach--advanced reflections. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by The hundred languages of children : the Reggio Emilia approach--advanced reflections with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The hundred languages of children : the Reggio Emilia approach--advanced reflections more than expected).
Fields of papers citing The hundred languages of children : the Reggio Emilia approach--advanced reflections
This network shows the impact of The hundred languages of children : the Reggio Emilia approach--advanced reflections. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the The hundred languages of children : the Reggio Emilia approach--advanced reflections.
About The hundred languages of children : the Reggio Emilia approach--advanced reflections
This paper, published in 1998, received 447 indexed citations . Written by Carolyn Pope Edwards, Lella Gandini and George E. Forman covering the research area of General Arts and Humanities, Artificial Intelligence and Education. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Education (346 citations), Sociology and Political Science (116 citations) and Developmental and Educational Psychology (63 citations).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w6720247.