Professional learning in the learning profession: A status report on teacher development in the United States and abroad.
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w63819036 →Countries where authors are citing Professional learning in the learning profession: A status report on teacher development in the United States and abroad.
This map shows the geographic impact of Professional learning in the learning profession: A status report on teacher development in the United States and abroad.. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Professional learning in the learning profession: A status report on teacher development in the United States and abroad. with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Professional learning in the learning profession: A status report on teacher development in the United States and abroad. more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Professional learning in the learning profession: A status report on teacher development in the United States and abroad.
This network shows the impact of Professional learning in the learning profession: A status report on teacher development in the United States and abroad.. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Professional learning in the learning profession: A status report on teacher development in the United States and abroad..
About Professional learning in the learning profession: A status report on teacher development in the United States and abroad.
This paper, published in 2009, received 1.0k indexed citations . Written by Linda Darling‐Hammond, Ruth Chung Wei, Nikole Richardson and Stelios Orphanos covering the research area of Education. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Education (894 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (251 citations) and Information Systems and Management (117 citations).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w63819036.