New Literacies: changing knowledge and classroom learning
Impact in
- Education 345
Classified as
- Authors
- Colín LankshearMichele Knobel
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w499087 →Countries where authors are citing New Literacies: changing knowledge and classroom learning
This map shows the geographic impact of New Literacies: changing knowledge and classroom learning. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by New Literacies: changing knowledge and classroom learning with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites New Literacies: changing knowledge and classroom learning more than expected).
Fields of papers citing New Literacies: changing knowledge and classroom learning
This network shows the impact of New Literacies: changing knowledge and classroom learning. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the New Literacies: changing knowledge and classroom learning.
About New Literacies: changing knowledge and classroom learning
This paper, published in 2003, received 696 indexed citations . Written by Colín Lankshear and Michele Knobel covering the research area of Communication, Literature and Literary Theory and Education. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Literature and Literary Theory (425 citations), Education (345 citations), Sociology and Political Science (186 citations), Speech and Hearing (155 citations) and Developmental and Educational Psychology (101 citations). Published in British Journal of Educational Studies.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w499087.