Independent work: choice, necessity and the gig economy
Impact in
- Marketing 90
Classified as
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w47492289 →Countries where authors are citing Independent work: choice, necessity and the gig economy
This map shows the geographic impact of Independent work: choice, necessity and the gig economy. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Independent work: choice, necessity and the gig economy with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Independent work: choice, necessity and the gig economy more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Independent work: choice, necessity and the gig economy
This network shows the impact of Independent work: choice, necessity and the gig economy. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Independent work: choice, necessity and the gig economy.
About Independent work: choice, necessity and the gig economy
This paper, published in 2016, received 231 indexed citations . Written by James Manyika, Susan Lund and Jacques Bughin covering the research area of General Health Professions and Sociology and Political Science. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Sociology and Political Science (156 citations), Marketing (90 citations), General Health Professions (69 citations), Economics and Econometrics (38 citations) and Demography (26 citations).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w47492289.