Teacher professional learning and development: Best evidence synthesis iteration

663 indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 2007, received 663 indexed citations. Written by Helen Timperley, Aaron Wilson and Irene Fung covering the research area of Information Systems and Management and Education. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Education (567 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (179 citations) and Information Systems and Management (94 citations). Published in ResearchSpace (University of Auckland).

In The Last Decade

doi.org/w15144946 →

Countries where authors are citing Teacher professional learning and development: Best evidence synthesis iteration

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Teacher professional learning and development: Best evidence synthesis iteration. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Teacher professional learning and development: Best evidence synthesis iteration with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Teacher professional learning and development: Best evidence synthesis iteration more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Teacher professional learning and development: Best evidence synthesis iteration

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Teacher professional learning and development: Best evidence synthesis iteration. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Teacher professional learning and development: Best evidence synthesis iteration.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/w15144946.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026