Digital Literacies: concepts, policies and practices

607 indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 2008, received 607 indexed citations. Written by Colín Lankshear and Michele Knobel covering the research area of Information Systems, Gender Studies and Library and Information Sciences. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Education (253 citations), Information Systems (215 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (177 citations). Published in ResearchOnline at James Cook University (James Cook University).

In The Last Decade

doi.org/w12331667 →

Countries where authors are citing Digital Literacies: concepts, policies and practices

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Digital Literacies: concepts, policies and practices. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Digital Literacies: concepts, policies and practices with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Digital Literacies: concepts, policies and practices more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Digital Literacies: concepts, policies and practices

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Digital Literacies: concepts, policies and practices. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Digital Literacies: concepts, policies and practices.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/w12331667.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026