The Compoundness and Sequentiality of Digital Inequality
- Authors
- Alexander Johannes Aloysius Maria van DeursenEllen HelsperRebecca EynonJohannes A.G.M. van Dijk
- Journal
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w11097534 →Countries where authors are citing The Compoundness and Sequentiality of Digital Inequality
This map shows the geographic impact of The Compoundness and Sequentiality of Digital Inequality. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by The Compoundness and Sequentiality of Digital Inequality with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The Compoundness and Sequentiality of Digital Inequality more than expected).
Fields of papers citing The Compoundness and Sequentiality of Digital Inequality
This network shows the impact of The Compoundness and Sequentiality of Digital Inequality. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the The Compoundness and Sequentiality of Digital Inequality.
About The Compoundness and Sequentiality of Digital Inequality
This paper, published in 2017, received 212 indexed citations . Written by Alexander Johannes Aloysius Maria van Deursen, Ellen Helsper, Rebecca Eynon and Johannes A.G.M. van Dijk covering the research area of Communication, Sociology and Political Science and Education. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Sociology and Political Science (109 citations), Communication (74 citations), Media Technology (45 citations), Information Systems (29 citations) and Demography (23 citations). Published in SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w11097534.