Cognitive and affective processes for learning science in immersive virtual reality

212 indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 2020, received 212 indexed citations. Written by Jocelyn Parong and Richard E. Mayer covering the research area of Developmental and Educational Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Human-Computer Interaction. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Human-Computer Interaction (147 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (85 citations) and Developmental and Educational Psychology (64 citations). Published in Journal of Computer Assisted Learning.

Countries where authors are citing Cognitive and affective processes for learning science in immersive virtual reality

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Cognitive and affective processes for learning science in immersive virtual reality. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Cognitive and affective processes for learning science in immersive virtual reality with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cognitive and affective processes for learning science in immersive virtual reality more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Cognitive and affective processes for learning science in immersive virtual reality

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Cognitive and affective processes for learning science in immersive virtual reality. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Cognitive and affective processes for learning science in immersive virtual reality.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12482.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026