What makes biology learning difficult and effective: Students’ views.
- Authors
- Atilla Çimer
- Journal
- Educational Research Review
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.5897/err11.205 →Countries where authors are citing What makes biology learning difficult and effective: Students’ views.
This map shows the geographic impact of What makes biology learning difficult and effective: Students’ views.. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by What makes biology learning difficult and effective: Students’ views. with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites What makes biology learning difficult and effective: Students’ views. more than expected).
Fields of papers citing What makes biology learning difficult and effective: Students’ views.
This network shows the impact of What makes biology learning difficult and effective: Students’ views.. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the What makes biology learning difficult and effective: Students’ views..
About What makes biology learning difficult and effective: Students’ views.
This paper, published in 2012, received 264 indexed citations . Written by Atilla Çimer covering the research area of Education. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Education (215 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (48 citations) and Information Systems (45 citations). Published in Educational Research Review.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.5897/err11.205.