Social Image and the 50-50 Norm: A Theoretical and Experimental Analysis of Audience Effects
- Journal
- Econometrica
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.3982/ecta7384 →Countries where authors are citing Social Image and the 50-50 Norm: A Theoretical and Experimental Analysis of Audience Effects
This map shows the geographic impact of Social Image and the 50-50 Norm: A Theoretical and Experimental Analysis of Audience Effects. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Social Image and the 50-50 Norm: A Theoretical and Experimental Analysis of Audience Effects with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Social Image and the 50-50 Norm: A Theoretical and Experimental Analysis of Audience Effects more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Social Image and the 50-50 Norm: A Theoretical and Experimental Analysis of Audience Effects
This network shows the impact of Social Image and the 50-50 Norm: A Theoretical and Experimental Analysis of Audience Effects. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Social Image and the 50-50 Norm: A Theoretical and Experimental Analysis of Audience Effects.
About Social Image and the 50-50 Norm: A Theoretical and Experimental Analysis of Audience Effects
This paper, published in 2009, received 710 indexed citations . Written by James Andreoni and B. Douglas Bernheim covering the research area of Demography, Safety Research and General Decision Sciences. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Safety Research (577 citations), Sociology and Political Science (288 citations) and Economics and Econometrics (184 citations). Published in Econometrica.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.3982/ecta7384.