Multiliteracies: Literacy Learning and the Design of Social Futures
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.2307/358703 →Countries where authors are citing Multiliteracies: Literacy Learning and the Design of Social Futures
This map shows the geographic impact of Multiliteracies: Literacy Learning and the Design of Social Futures. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Multiliteracies: Literacy Learning and the Design of Social Futures with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Multiliteracies: Literacy Learning and the Design of Social Futures more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Multiliteracies: Literacy Learning and the Design of Social Futures
This network shows the impact of Multiliteracies: Literacy Learning and the Design of Social Futures. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Multiliteracies: Literacy Learning and the Design of Social Futures.
About Multiliteracies: Literacy Learning and the Design of Social Futures
This paper, published in 2001, received 1.4k indexed citations . Written by John Trimbur, Bill Cope and Mary Kalantzis covering the research area of Literature and Literary Theory. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Literature and Literary Theory (929 citations), Education (627 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (322 citations). Published in College Composition and Communication.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.2307/358703.