Theory in Practice: Increasing Professional Effectiveness

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 1950, received 2.7k indexed citations. Written by Philip J. Runkel, Chris Argyris and Donald A. Schön covering the research area of . It is primarily cited by scholars working on Education (1.1k citations), Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (487 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (399 citations). Published in The Journal of Higher Education.

In The Last Decade

doi.org/10.2307/1978718 →

Countries where authors are citing Theory in Practice: Increasing Professional Effectiveness

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Theory in Practice: Increasing Professional Effectiveness. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Theory in Practice: Increasing Professional Effectiveness with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Theory in Practice: Increasing Professional Effectiveness more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Theory in Practice: Increasing Professional Effectiveness

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Theory in Practice: Increasing Professional Effectiveness. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Theory in Practice: Increasing Professional Effectiveness.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.2307/1978718.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026