Vitamin C Equivalent Antioxidant Capacity (VCEAC) of Phenolic Phytochemicals

887 indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 2002, received 887 indexed citations. Written by Dae‐Ok Kim, Ki Won Lee, Hyong Joo Lee and Chang Yong Lee covering the research area of Organic Chemistry and Biochemistry. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Biochemistry (479 citations), Food Science (307 citations) and Plant Science (263 citations). Published in Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry.

Countries where authors are citing Vitamin C Equivalent Antioxidant Capacity (VCEAC) of Phenolic Phytochemicals

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Vitamin C Equivalent Antioxidant Capacity (VCEAC) of Phenolic Phytochemicals. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Vitamin C Equivalent Antioxidant Capacity (VCEAC) of Phenolic Phytochemicals with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Vitamin C Equivalent Antioxidant Capacity (VCEAC) of Phenolic Phytochemicals more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Vitamin C Equivalent Antioxidant Capacity (VCEAC) of Phenolic Phytochemicals

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Vitamin C Equivalent Antioxidant Capacity (VCEAC) of Phenolic Phytochemicals. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Vitamin C Equivalent Antioxidant Capacity (VCEAC) of Phenolic Phytochemicals.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1021/jf020071c.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026