Revealing the invisible hand: The role of teachers in children's peer experiences

402 indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 2011, received 402 indexed citations. Written by Thomas W. Farmer, Meghan McAuliffe Lines and Jill V. Hamm covering the research area of Clinical Psychology and Education. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Education (301 citations), Social Psychology (180 citations) and Clinical Psychology (139 citations). Published in Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology.

Countries where authors are citing Revealing the invisible hand: The role of teachers in children's peer experiences

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Revealing the invisible hand: The role of teachers in children's peer experiences. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Revealing the invisible hand: The role of teachers in children's peer experiences with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Revealing the invisible hand: The role of teachers in children's peer experiences more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Revealing the invisible hand: The role of teachers in children's peer experiences

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Revealing the invisible hand: The role of teachers in children's peer experiences. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Revealing the invisible hand: The role of teachers in children's peer experiences.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2011.04.006.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026