Activity theory as a framework for designing constructivist learning environments
- Authors
- David H. Jonassen
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1007/bf02299477 →Countries where authors are citing Activity theory as a framework for designing constructivist learning environments
This map shows the geographic impact of Activity theory as a framework for designing constructivist learning environments. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Activity theory as a framework for designing constructivist learning environments with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Activity theory as a framework for designing constructivist learning environments more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Activity theory as a framework for designing constructivist learning environments
This network shows the impact of Activity theory as a framework for designing constructivist learning environments. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Activity theory as a framework for designing constructivist learning environments.
About Activity theory as a framework for designing constructivist learning environments
This paper, published in 1999, received 671 indexed citations . Written by David H. Jonassen covering the research area of Education, Developmental and Educational Psychology and Human Factors and Ergonomics. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Education (360 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (277 citations) and Computer Science Applications (120 citations). Published in Educational Technology Research and Development.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1007/bf02299477.