A Strong Maximum Principle for some quasilinear elliptic equations
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1007/bf01449041 →Countries where authors are citing A Strong Maximum Principle for some quasilinear elliptic equations
This map shows the geographic impact of A Strong Maximum Principle for some quasilinear elliptic equations. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by A Strong Maximum Principle for some quasilinear elliptic equations with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites A Strong Maximum Principle for some quasilinear elliptic equations more than expected).
Fields of papers citing A Strong Maximum Principle for some quasilinear elliptic equations
This network shows the impact of A Strong Maximum Principle for some quasilinear elliptic equations. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the A Strong Maximum Principle for some quasilinear elliptic equations.
About A Strong Maximum Principle for some quasilinear elliptic equations
This paper, published in 1984, received 837 indexed citations . covering the research area of Control and Systems Engineering, Applied Mathematics and Computational Theory and Mathematics. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Applied Mathematics (816 citations), Computational Theory and Mathematics (769 citations) and Mathematical Physics (279 citations). Published in Applied Mathematics & Optimization.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1007/bf01449041.