The United Nations World Water Development Report 2015: Water for a Sustainable World

837 indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 2016, received 837 indexed citations. Written by covering the research area of Sociology and Political Science and Ocean Engineering. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Water Science and Technology (389 citations), Ocean Engineering (207 citations) and Environmental Engineering (180 citations). Published in .

In The Last Decade

doi.org/w4703954 →

Countries where authors are citing The United Nations World Water Development Report 2015: Water for a Sustainable World

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of The United Nations World Water Development Report 2015: Water for a Sustainable World. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by The United Nations World Water Development Report 2015: Water for a Sustainable World with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The United Nations World Water Development Report 2015: Water for a Sustainable World more than expected).

Fields of papers citing The United Nations World Water Development Report 2015: Water for a Sustainable World

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of The United Nations World Water Development Report 2015: Water for a Sustainable World. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the The United Nations World Water Development Report 2015: Water for a Sustainable World.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/w4703954.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026