Remarks on the breakdown of smooth solutions for the 3-D Euler equations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 1950, received 915 indexed citations. Written by J. Thomas Beale, T. Kato and Andrew J. Majda covering the research area of Applied Mathematics, Mathematical Physics and Computational Mechanics. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Applied Mathematics (845 citations), Mathematical Physics (536 citations) and Computational Mechanics (503 citations). Published in Communications in Mathematical Physics.

Countries where authors are citing Remarks on the breakdown of smooth solutions for the 3-D Euler equations

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Remarks on the breakdown of smooth solutions for the 3-D Euler equations. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Remarks on the breakdown of smooth solutions for the 3-D Euler equations with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Remarks on the breakdown of smooth solutions for the 3-D Euler equations more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Remarks on the breakdown of smooth solutions for the 3-D Euler equations

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Remarks on the breakdown of smooth solutions for the 3-D Euler equations. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Remarks on the breakdown of smooth solutions for the 3-D Euler equations.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1007/bf01212349.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026