Glutamine and glutamate—their central role in cell metabolism and function

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 1950, received 520 indexed citations. Written by Philip Newsholme, Joaquim Procópio, Tânia Cristina Pithon‐Curi and Rui Curi covering the research area of Biochemistry, Physiology and Clinical Biochemistry. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Molecular Biology (201 citations), Physiology (108 citations) and Nutrition and Dietetics (71 citations). Published in Cell Biochemistry and Function.

In The Last Decade

doi.org/10.1002/cbf.1003 →

Countries where authors are citing Glutamine and glutamate—their central role in cell metabolism and function

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Glutamine and glutamate—their central role in cell metabolism and function. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Glutamine and glutamate—their central role in cell metabolism and function with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Glutamine and glutamate—their central role in cell metabolism and function more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Glutamine and glutamate—their central role in cell metabolism and function

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Glutamine and glutamate—their central role in cell metabolism and function. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Glutamine and glutamate—their central role in cell metabolism and function.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1002/cbf.1003.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026