Zhicheng Li
-
- Healthcare Quality and Management 4
- Pharmacy top 5%
- Clinical Psychology top 10%
- General Health Professions top 10%
- Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes 4
- Primary Care and Health Outcomes 2
-
- Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research 3
-
- Cancer survivorship and care 3
-
- Patient Safety and Medication Errors 2
-
- Medication Adherence and Compliance 2
-
- Health disparities and outcomes 2
- Co-authors
- Robyn Clay‐WilliamsJeffrey BraithwaiteNatalie TaylorScott GriffithsStephen TouyzJonathan MondJeanie SheffieldStuart B. Murray
- Partner nations
- AustraliaUnited StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Zhicheng Li
19 papers receiving 409 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 87
- Health Information Management 51
- Pharmacy 53
- Research and Theory 7
- Clinical Psychology 117
- General Health Professions 135
Countries citing papers authored by Zhicheng Li
This map shows the geographic impact of Zhicheng Li's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Zhicheng Li with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Zhicheng Li more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Zhicheng Li
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Zhicheng Li. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Zhicheng Li. The network helps show where Zhicheng Li may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Zhicheng Li, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2024 | 2 | |
| 2 | 2024 | 7 | |
| 3 | 2023 | 2 | |
| 4 | 2021 | 48 | |
| 5 | 2021 | 52 | |
| 6 | 2019 | 9 | |
| 7 | 2018 | 7 | |
| 8 | 2017 | 60 | |
| 9 | Final Report for the IMAB-Q study: Validation and Feasibility Testing of a Novel Questionnaire to Identify Barriers to Medication Adherence | 2017 | 7 |
| 10 | 2016 | 15 | |
| 11 | 2016 | 6 | |
| 12 | 2015 | 15 | |
| 13 | 2015 | 30 | |
| 14 | 2015 | 54 | |
| 15 | 2015 | 95 | |
| 16 | 2014 | 1 | |
| 17 | 2014 | 3 | |
| 18 | Survey Report of the DASS-21 in Tinnitus Patients | 2013 | 1 |
| 19 | 2009 | 1 | |
| 20 | 2000 | 2 |
About Zhicheng Li
Zhicheng Li is a scholar working on Family Practice, Health Information Management and Geriatrics and Gerontology, having authored 20 papers that have together received 417 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (4 papers), Healthcare Quality and Management (4 papers), Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (3 papers), Cancer survivorship and care (3 papers), Patient Safety and Medication Errors (2 papers), Medication Adherence and Compliance (2 papers), Health disparities and outcomes (2 papers) and Primary Care and Health Outcomes (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health Information Management (51 citations), Pharmacy (53 citations) and Research and Theory (7 citations). Zhicheng Li has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Robyn Clay‐Williams, Jeffrey Braithwaite, Natalie Taylor, Scott Griffiths, Stephen Touyz, Jonathan Mond, Jeanie Sheffield, Stuart B. Murray, Yun‐Hee Jeon and Lynn Chenoweth. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, BMJ Open and International Journal of Eating Disorders.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.