Alexandra L. Dima
- Physiology top 5%
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine top 10%
- General Health Professions top 5%
- Family Practice top 0.5%
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 5%
- Co-authors
- Marijn de BruinÉric Van GanseDan DediuMontse FerrerGimena HernándezGeorge LewithPaul LittleFelicity L. Bishop
- Topics
- Medication Adherence and Compliance (33 papers)Asthma and respiratory diseases (24 papers)Bipolar Disorder and Treatment (13 papers)
- Journals
- PLoS ONEScientific ReportsPain
- Partner nations
- FranceNetherlandsUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Alexandra L. Dima
91 papers receiving 1.6k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 131
- Physiology 416
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 383
- General Health Professions 360
- Family Practice 298
- Psychiatry and Mental health 219
Countries citing papers authored by Alexandra L. Dima
This map shows the geographic impact of Alexandra L. Dima's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Alexandra L. Dima with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Alexandra L. Dima more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Alexandra L. Dima
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Alexandra L. Dima. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Alexandra L. Dima. The network helps show where Alexandra L. Dima may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Alexandra L. Dima
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Alexandra L. Dima. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Alexandra L. Dima based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Alexandra L. Dima. Alexandra L. Dima is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 2 | |
| 6 | 3 | |
| 7 | 11 | |
| 8 | 4 | |
| 9 | 10 | |
| 10 | 1 | |
| 11 | 12 | |
| 12 | Personal determinants of participation restriction after stroke - a systematic review of observational and qualitative studies | 1 |
| 13 | 65 | |
| 14 | 7 | |
| 15 | Measurement in health psychology: combining theory, qualitative, and quantitative methods to do it right | 3 |
| 16 | 14 | |
| 17 | The opportunities Item Response Theory (IRT) offers to health psychologists | 1 |
| 18 | 1 | |
| 19 | 1 | |
| 20 | Identifying patients' beliefs about treatments for chronic low back pain in primary care: | 1 |
About Alexandra L. Dima
Alexandra L. Dima is a scholar working on Family Practice, Applied Psychology and Psychiatry and Mental health, having authored 98 papers that have together received 1.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Medication Adherence and Compliance (33 papers), Asthma and respiratory diseases (24 papers) and Bipolar Disorder and Treatment (13 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Family Practice (298 citations), Geriatrics and Gerontology (81 citations) and Applied Psychology (100 citations). Alexandra L. Dima has collaborated with scholars based in France, Netherlands and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Marijn de Bruin, Éric Van Ganse, Dan Dediu, Montse Ferrer, Gimena Hernández, George Lewith, Paul Little, Felicity L. Bishop, Nadine E. Foster and Rona Moss‐Morris. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, Scientific Reports and Pain.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.