Zeno Vendler
- Language and Linguistics top 0.1%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 1%
- Artificial Intelligence top 1%
- Philosophy top 0.5%
- Linguistics and Language top 1%
- Co-authors
- Sally McConnell‐GinetCarl GinetKenneth M. SayreSteven DavisN. L. WilsonCharles E. CatonDavid KnowlesHenry E. Kyburg
- Topics
- Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (3 papers)Philosophy and Theoretical Science (2 papers)Classical Philosophy and Thought (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesCanada
In The Last Decade
Zeno Vendler
30 papers receiving 2.3k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 89
- Language and Linguistics 2.1k
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 1.0k
- Artificial Intelligence 1.0k
- Philosophy 569
- Linguistics and Language 409
Countries citing papers authored by Zeno Vendler
This map shows the geographic impact of Zeno Vendler's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Zeno Vendler with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Zeno Vendler more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Zeno Vendler
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Zeno Vendler. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Zeno Vendler. The network helps show where Zeno Vendler may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Zeno Vendler
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Zeno Vendler. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Zeno Vendler based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Zeno Vendler. Zeno Vendler is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | 8 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 3 | |
| 7 | 5 | |
| 8 | Reply to Professor Aune | 1 |
| 9 | On What We Know | 3 |
| 10 | Res cogitans : an essay in rational psychology | 29 |
| 11 | 2 | |
| 12 | 4 | |
| 13 | 7 | |
| 14 | Adjectives and Nominalizations | 145 |
| 15 | 27 | |
| 16 | 1 | |
| 17 | 1 | |
| 18 | 34 | |
| 19 | 40 | |
| 20 | Verbs and Timesbreakdown → | 960 |
About Zeno Vendler
Zeno Vendler is a scholar working on History and Philosophy of Science, Philosophy and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 32 papers that have together received 3.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (3 papers), Philosophy and Theoretical Science (2 papers) and Classical Philosophy and Thought (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Language and Linguistics (2.1k citations), Linguistics and Language (409 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (1.0k citations). Zeno Vendler has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Sally McConnell‐Ginet, Carl Ginet, Kenneth M. Sayre, Steven Davis, N. L. Wilson, Charles E. Caton, David Knowles, Henry E. Kyburg and Hal Berghel. Their work appears in journals such as The Philosophical Review, The Journal of Philosophy and Journal of Pragmatics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.