Zelong Yi

41 papers receiving 739 citations

Peers

Zelong Yi
Comparison fields: 5 of 83
  • Management Information Systems 366
  • Marketing 275
  • Strategy and Management 365
  • Business and International Management 27
  • Management Science and Operations Research 116
Replace Xin Fang with:
Xin Fang China
Stanko Dimitrov Canada
Lei Xie China
Preetam Basu India
Bin Cao China
Yuanguang Zhong China
Qingying Li China
Mengqi Liu China
Manu Goyal United States
Zelong Yi relative to Xin Fang China Xin Fang's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Xin Fang · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Zelong Yi

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Zelong Yi's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Zelong Yi with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Zelong Yi more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Zelong Yi

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Zelong Yi. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Zelong Yi. The network helps show where Zelong Yi may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Zelong Yi, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Zelong Yi Line = papers co-authored together Zelong Yi links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 43 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2021119
2 201894
3 202073
4 202059
5 201742
6 202136
7 202032
8 202130
9 202025
10 201822
11 202122
12 201719
13 202318
14 202218
15 201617
16 202416
17 201816
18 202114
19 20239
20 20188

About Zelong Yi

Zelong Yi is a scholar working on Management Information Systems, Marketing, Management Science and Operations Research, Strategy and Management and Economics and Econometrics, having authored 43 papers that have together received 759 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Supply Chain and Inventory Management (15 papers), Consumer Market Behavior and Pricing (14 papers), Auction Theory and Applications (12 papers), Sustainable Supply Chain Management (9 papers), Digital Platforms and Economics (6 papers), Innovation Diffusion and Forecasting (4 papers), Innovation and Socioeconomic Development (3 papers) and Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Management Information Systems (366 citations), Marketing (275 citations), Strategy and Management (365 citations), Business and International Management (27 citations) and Management Science and Operations Research (116 citations). Zelong Yi has collaborated with scholars based in China, Hong Kong and United States. Frequent co-authors include Ying‐Ju Chen, Yulan Wang, Zhong‐Zhong Jiang, Xu Guan, Yun Liu, Ki Ling Cheung, Man Yu, Fan Li, Xiaolong Guo and Mingzhu Yu. Their work appears in journals such as Production and Operations Management, Transportation Research Part E Logistics and Transportation Review, Industrial Management & Data Systems, International Journal of Production Research and Omega.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact