Yi-Chun Chen
- Management Science and Operations Research top 5%
- Economics and Econometrics top 10%
- Safety Research top 5%
- Artificial Intelligence
- Marketing
- Co-authors
- Gwo‐Hshiung TzengXiao LuoNgo Van LongEduardo D. FaingoldSatoru TakahashiYeneng SunChau‐Chen TorngTom Wilkening
- Topics
- Game Theory and Applications (18 papers)Auction Theory and Applications (18 papers)Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies (10 papers)
- Partner nations
- SingaporeUnited StatesChina
In The Last Decade
Yi-Chun Chen
25 papers receiving 273 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 69
- Management Science and Operations Research 208
- Economics and Econometrics 104
- Safety Research 71
- Artificial Intelligence 31
- Marketing 26
Countries citing papers authored by Yi-Chun Chen
This map shows the geographic impact of Yi-Chun Chen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Yi-Chun Chen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Yi-Chun Chen more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Yi-Chun Chen
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Yi-Chun Chen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Yi-Chun Chen. The network helps show where Yi-Chun Chen may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Yi-Chun Chen
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Yi-Chun Chen. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Yi-Chun Chen based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Yi-Chun Chen. Yi-Chun Chen is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 4 | |
| 5 | 4 | |
| 6 | 6 | |
| 7 | 19 | |
| 8 | 2 | |
| 9 | 2 | |
| 10 | 8 | |
| 11 | APPLICATION OF MULTIPLE CRITERIA DECISION MAKING (MCDM) ON HIGH POTENTIAL CITY BUS ROUTES IN TAIWAN | 2 |
| 12 | 20 | |
| 13 | 5 | |
| 14 | 13 | |
| 15 | 10 | |
| 16 | 27 | |
| 17 | 99 | |
| 18 | 5 | |
| 19 | 35 | |
| 20 | AU nified Approach to Information, Knowledge, and Stability ∗ | 1 |
About Yi-Chun Chen
Yi-Chun Chen is a scholar working on Management Science and Operations Research, Safety Research and General Decision Sciences, having authored 29 papers that have together received 287 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Game Theory and Applications (18 papers), Auction Theory and Applications (18 papers) and Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies (10 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Management Science and Operations Research (208 citations), Safety Research (71 citations) and General Decision Sciences (12 citations). Yi-Chun Chen has collaborated with scholars based in Singapore, United States and China. Frequent co-authors include Gwo‐Hshiung Tzeng, Xiao Luo, Ngo Van Long, Eduardo D. Faingold, Satoru Takahashi, Yeneng Sun, Chau‐Chen Torng, Tom Wilkening, Richard Holden and Manuel Mueller-Frank. Their work appears in journals such as Econometrica, Journal of Political Economy and Expert Systems with Applications.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.