Xiaoya Ding
Impact in
- Accounting top 5%
- Corporate Finance and Governance
- Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance
- Finance top 10%
- Financial Markets and Investment Strategies
Papers in
- Finance 9
- Financial Markets and Investment Strategies 8
- Banking stability, regulation, efficiency 4
-
- Corporate Finance and Governance 8
- Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance 5
- Co-authors
- Samir Saadi (3 shared papers)Sabri Boubaker (2 shared papers)Hatem Rjiba (2 shared papers)Yang Ni (3 shared papers)Ligang Zhong (5 shared papers)Mengmeng Guo (2 shared papers)Tao Yang (1 shared paper)Nicholas S. P. Tay (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- Chinese Economy (5 papers)Thunderbird International Business Review (1 paper)Journal of Empirical Finance (1 paper)Journal of Banking & Finance (1 paper)International Review of Economics & Finance (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesCanadaChina
In The Last Decade
Xiaoya Ding
14 papers receiving 253 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 40
- Accounting 151
- Finance 81
- Strategy and Management 89
- Economics and Econometrics 67
- Marketing 14
Countries citing papers authored by Xiaoya Ding
This map shows the geographic impact of Xiaoya Ding's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Xiaoya Ding with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Xiaoya Ding more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Xiaoya Ding
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Xiaoya Ding. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Xiaoya Ding. The network helps show where Xiaoya Ding may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 14 scholars most cited alongside Xiaoya Ding, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2021 | 118 | |
| 2 | 2020 | 25 | |
| 3 | 2016 | 24 | |
| 4 | 2020 | 21 | |
| 5 | 2022 | 18 | |
| 6 | 2018 | 12 | |
| 7 | 2016 | 9 | |
| 8 | 2015 | 9 | |
| 9 | 2016 | 7 | |
| 10 | 2017 | 6 | |
| 11 | 2016 | 4 | |
| 12 | 2020 | 2 | |
| 13 | 2020 | 2 | |
| 14 | 2025 | 1 | |
| 15 | 2025 | 0 |
About Xiaoya Ding
Xiaoya Ding is a scholar working on Finance, Accounting, Economics and Econometrics, Strategy and Management and Political Science and International Relations, having authored 15 papers that have together received 258 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Corporate Finance and Governance (8 papers), Financial Markets and Investment Strategies (8 papers), Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance (5 papers), Banking stability, regulation, efficiency (4 papers), Housing Market and Economics (2 papers), International Business and FDI (1 paper), Energy, Environment, Economic Growth (1 paper) and Innovation and Knowledge Management (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Accounting (151 citations), Finance (81 citations), Strategy and Management (89 citations), Economics and Econometrics (67 citations) and Marketing (14 citations). Xiaoya Ding has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and China. Frequent co-authors include Samir Saadi, Sabri Boubaker, Hatem Rjiba, Yang Ni, Ligang Zhong, Mengmeng Guo, Tao Yang, Nicholas S. P. Tay, Geng Niu and Jeffrey Pittman. Their work appears in journals such as Chinese Economy, Thunderbird International Business Review, Journal of Empirical Finance, Journal of Banking & Finance and International Review of Economics & Finance.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.