Xiaojun Li

40 total papers · 870 total citations
25 papers, 598 citations indexed

About

Xiaojun Li is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Social Psychology and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Xiaojun Li has authored 25 papers receiving a total of 598 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 17 papers in Clinical Psychology, 13 papers in Social Psychology and 5 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology. Recurrent topics in Xiaojun Li's work include Emotions and Moral Behavior (7 papers), Child Abuse and Trauma (5 papers) and Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (4 papers). Xiaojun Li is often cited by papers focused on Emotions and Moral Behavior (7 papers), Child Abuse and Trauma (5 papers) and Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (4 papers). Xiaojun Li collaborates with scholars based in China, United States and France. Xiaojun Li's co-authors include E. N. Economou, Alan Gilchrist, Tiziano Agostini, Vidal Annan, Branka Špehar, Joseph Cataliotti, Frederick Bonato, Yanhui Xiang, Xinsheng Jiang and Liping Ma and has published in prestigious journals such as Psychological Review, Scientific Reports and Journal of Affective Disorders.

In The Last Decade

Xiaojun Li

19 papers receiving 571 citations

Author Peers

Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields. citations · hero ref

Author Last Decade Papers Cites
Xiaojun Li 432 312 289 107 77 25 598
David H. Westendorf 580 1.3× 78 0.3× 169 0.6× 42 0.4× 30 0.4× 21 691
Drake R. Bradley 327 0.8× 80 0.3× 153 0.5× 46 0.4× 22 0.3× 35 664
Thomas H. Taylor 411 1.0× 215 0.7× 227 0.8× 103 1.0× 6 0.1× 14 594
Sarah Allred 435 1.0× 99 0.3× 179 0.6× 63 0.6× 6 0.1× 29 662
Elena Gheorghiu 487 1.1× 120 0.4× 149 0.5× 50 0.5× 4 0.1× 58 569
Filipp Schmidt 543 1.3× 22 0.1× 139 0.5× 85 0.8× 20 0.3× 54 664
Fatima M. Felisberti 320 0.7× 24 0.1× 74 0.3× 182 1.7× 26 0.3× 45 646
Katherine R. Storrs 394 0.9× 27 0.1× 87 0.3× 140 1.3× 24 0.3× 30 539
Matteo Toscani 499 1.2× 211 0.7× 257 0.9× 106 1.0× 3 0.0× 44 605
H. A. Sedgwick 450 1.0× 23 0.1× 107 0.4× 85 0.8× 10 0.1× 21 546

Countries citing papers authored by Xiaojun Li

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Xiaojun Li's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Xiaojun Li with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Xiaojun Li more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Xiaojun Li

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Xiaojun Li. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Xiaojun Li. The network helps show where Xiaojun Li may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Xiaojun Li

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Xiaojun Li. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Xiaojun Li based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Xiaojun Li. Xiaojun Li is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Loading papers...

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026