Xiao‐Fei Yang

663 citations
23 papers · 448 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

Xiao‐Fei Yang

23 papers receiving 434 citations

Peers

Xiao‐Fei Yang
Comparison fields: 5 of 87
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 56
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 178
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 82
  • Social Psychology 119
  • Clinical Psychology 85
Replace Gemma Reynolds with:
Gemma Reynolds United Kingdom
Mara van der Meulen Netherlands
Verena Ly Netherlands
Konstantina Zougkou United Kingdom
Eduard T. Klapwijk Netherlands
Morgan Botdorf United States
Charlotte Küpper Germany
Sarah Rutter United States
Elisabeth Schreuders Netherlands
Kevin Fleming United States
Xiao‐Fei Yang relative to Gemma Reynolds United Kingdom Gemma Reynolds's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.4×
Gemma Reynolds · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Xiao‐Fei Yang

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Xiao‐Fei Yang's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Xiao‐Fei Yang with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Xiao‐Fei Yang more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Xiao‐Fei Yang

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Xiao‐Fei Yang. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Xiao‐Fei Yang. The network helps show where Xiao‐Fei Yang may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Xiao‐Fei Yang, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Xiao‐Fei Yang Line = papers co-authored together Xiao‐Fei Yang links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 23 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200756
2 201450
3 201844
4 201241
5 201332
6 201532
7 201631
8 202027
9 201721
10 201920
11 201816
12 202115
13 202210
14 20218
15 20247
16 20237
17 20216
18 20156
19 20156
20 20175

About Xiao‐Fei Yang

Xiao‐Fei Yang is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Social Psychology, Clinical Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, having authored 23 papers that have together received 448 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cultural Differences and Values (5 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (4 papers), Memory and Neural Mechanisms (4 papers), Inhalation and Respiratory Drug Delivery (3 papers), Face Recognition and Perception (3 papers), Stress Responses and Cortisol (3 papers), Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction (2 papers) and Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Behavioral Neuroscience (56 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (178 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (82 citations), Social Psychology (119 citations) and Clinical Psychology (85 citations). Xiao‐Fei Yang has collaborated with scholars based in United States, China and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Mary Helen Immordino‐Yang, Hanna Damásio, Bao‐Ming Li, Lan Ma, Haoying Li, Yufei Lu, Larissa A. Borofsky, Darby Saxbe, Simone Kühn and Oisín Butler. Their work appears in journals such as Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, Frontiers in Psychology, Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, npj Science of Learning and Journal of Drug Delivery Science and Technology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact