Elisabeth Schreuders
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 10%
- Clinical Psychology top 10%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 5%
- Social Psychology top 10%
- Applied Psychology top 10%
- Co-authors
- Eveline A. CroneJiska S. PeperBerna GüroğluNeeltje E. BlankensteinLara M. WierengaMarieke BosChristian K. TamnesBarbara R. Braams
- Topics
- Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (7 papers)Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (5 papers)Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (5 papers)
- Partner nations
- NetherlandsBelgiumNorway
In The Last Decade
Elisabeth Schreuders
13 papers receiving 508 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 78
- Cognitive Neuroscience 220
- Clinical Psychology 171
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 162
- Social Psychology 154
- Applied Psychology 56
Countries citing papers authored by Elisabeth Schreuders
This map shows the geographic impact of Elisabeth Schreuders's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Elisabeth Schreuders with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Elisabeth Schreuders more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Elisabeth Schreuders
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Elisabeth Schreuders. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Elisabeth Schreuders. The network helps show where Elisabeth Schreuders may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Elisabeth Schreuders
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Elisabeth Schreuders. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Elisabeth Schreuders based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Elisabeth Schreuders. Elisabeth Schreuders is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 3 | |
| 4 | 5 | |
| 5 | 24 | |
| 6 | 19 | |
| 7 | 36 | |
| 8 | 27 | |
| 9 | 108 | |
| 10 | 52 | |
| 11 | 134 | |
| 12 | 52 | |
| 13 | 55 |
About Elisabeth Schreuders
Elisabeth Schreuders is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, General Decision Sciences and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 13 papers that have together received 517 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (7 papers), Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (5 papers) and Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Decision Sciences (38 citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (47 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (162 citations). Elisabeth Schreuders has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, Belgium and Norway. Frequent co-authors include Eveline A. Crone, Jiska S. Peper, Berna Güroğlu, Neeltje E. Blankenstein, Lara M. Wierenga, Marieke Bos, Christian K. Tamnes, Barbara R. Braams, Anna C. K. van Duijvenvoorde and Geert‐Jan Will. Their work appears in journals such as Nature Communications, NeuroImage and Child Development.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.