XiaoChen Tang

1.9k citations
131 papers · 1.3k · h-index 21

Impact in

Papers in

XiaoChen Tang

117 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Peers

XiaoChen Tang
Comparison fields: 5 of 102
  • Biological Psychiatry 227
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 641
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 494
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 302
  • Philosophy 206
Replace Gillian A. O’Driscoll with:
Gillian A. O’Driscoll Canada
Ramón Landín-Romero Australia
Katharina Stegmayer Switzerland
Joanna Katsanis United States
Janardhanan C. Narayanaswamy India
Tuukka T. Raij Finland
Zhenying Qian China
Godehard Weniger Germany
Venkataram Shivakumar India
Kristiina Kompus Norway
XiaoChen Tang relative to Gillian A. O’Driscoll Canada Gillian A. O’Driscoll's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×8.8×
Gillian A. O’Driscoll · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by XiaoChen Tang

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of XiaoChen Tang's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by XiaoChen Tang with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites XiaoChen Tang more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by XiaoChen Tang

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by XiaoChen Tang. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by XiaoChen Tang. The network helps show where XiaoChen Tang may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside XiaoChen Tang, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with XiaoChen Tang Line = papers co-authored together XiaoChen Tang links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 131 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201865
2 201947
3 202045
4 201842
5 201642
6 201540
7 201940
8 202034
9 201933
10 202031
11 201928
12 201826
13 201925
14 201924
15 202222
16 201822
17 201722
18 202121
19 201721
20 202021

About XiaoChen Tang

XiaoChen Tang is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Cognitive Neuroscience, Philosophy, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Clinical Psychology, having authored 131 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Schizophrenia research and treatment (62 papers), Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (36 papers), Mental Health and Psychiatry (27 papers), Tryptophan and brain disorders (18 papers), Mental Health Research Topics (17 papers), Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders (16 papers), Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (14 papers) and Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies (11 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biological Psychiatry (227 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (641 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (494 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (302 citations) and Philosophy (206 citations). XiaoChen Tang has collaborated with scholars based in China, United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Tianhong Zhang, Lihua Xu, YanYan Wei, Jijun Wang, Yingying Tang, HuiRu Cui, Chunbo Li, YeGang Hu, Jijun Wang and Zhenying Qian. Their work appears in journals such as Frontiers in Psychiatry, Psychological Medicine, European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience, Schizophrenia Research and Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact