Jun‐Juan Zhu
About
In The Last Decade
Jun‐Juan Zhu
11 papers receiving 156 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 41
- Neurology 117
- Psychiatry and Mental health 61
- Cognitive Neuroscience 59
- Clinical Psychology 46
- Neurology 20
Countries citing papers authored by Jun‐Juan Zhu
This map shows the geographic impact of Jun‐Juan Zhu's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jun‐Juan Zhu with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jun‐Juan Zhu more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Jun‐Juan Zhu
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jun‐Juan Zhu. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jun‐Juan Zhu. The network helps show where Jun‐Juan Zhu may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jun‐Juan Zhu
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jun‐Juan Zhu. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jun‐Juan Zhu based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jun‐Juan Zhu. Jun‐Juan Zhu is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 0 | |
| 5 | 15 | |
| 6 | 20 | |
| 7 | 16 | |
| 8 | 13 | |
| 9 | 4 | |
| 10 | 15 | |
| 11 | 42 | |
| 12 | 9 | |
| 13 | 22 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.