Xenia Tonesk

553 total citations
12 papers, 452 citations indexed

About

Xenia Tonesk is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, General Health Professions and Family Practice. According to data from OpenAlex, Xenia Tonesk has authored 12 papers receiving a total of 452 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 7 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, 4 papers in General Health Professions and 3 papers in Family Practice. Recurrent topics in Xenia Tonesk's work include Innovations in Medical Education (5 papers), Medical Education and Admissions (3 papers) and Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills (3 papers). Xenia Tonesk is often cited by papers focused on Innovations in Medical Education (5 papers), Medical Education and Admissions (3 papers) and Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills (3 papers). Xenia Tonesk collaborates with scholars based in United States. Xenia Tonesk's co-authors include Peter Jacobson, Brian S. Mittman, Jan D. Carline, D. Daniel Hunt, Maurice Lorr, Richard Vial, James B. Erdmann, Robin Buchanan, Richard Buchanan and Warren C. Plauché and has published in prestigious journals such as Academic Medicine, Medical Education and Journal of Research in Personality.

In The Last Decade

Xenia Tonesk

10 papers receiving 408 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Xenia Tonesk United States	7	234	212	76	70	47	12	452
Joseph S. Green United States	4	324 1.4×	280 1.3×	57 0.8×	20 0.3×	42 0.9×	6	569
Diana Tabak Canada	12	348 1.5×	286 1.3×	104 1.4×	98 1.4×	31 0.7×	19	710
Alfred Reid United States	14	278 1.2×	315 1.5×	33 0.4×	59 0.8×	32 0.7×	30	548
Junji Otaki Japan	14	347 1.5×	217 1.0×	137 1.8×	29 0.4×	52 1.1×	39	663
Anne G. Pereira United States	16	287 1.2×	267 1.3×	87 1.1×	99 1.4×	68 1.4×	32	537
Sjoerd Hobma Netherlands	10	206 0.9×	265 1.3×	94 1.2×	106 1.5×	31 0.7×	28	515
Allyn Walsh Canada	13	327 1.4×	233 1.1×	103 1.4×	25 0.4×	49 1.0×	42	511
Paul Ram Netherlands	11	174 0.7×	214 1.0×	111 1.5×	26 0.4×	19 0.4×	19	367
Kevin Hinchey United States	12	300 1.3×	164 0.8×	88 1.2×	21 0.3×	60 1.3×	23	473
Eric Katz United States	16	294 1.3×	116 0.5×	110 1.4×	29 0.4×	84 1.8×	32	572

Countries citing papers authored by Xenia Tonesk

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Xenia Tonesk's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Xenia Tonesk with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Xenia Tonesk more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Xenia Tonesk

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Xenia Tonesk. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Xenia Tonesk. The network helps show where Xenia Tonesk may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Xenia Tonesk

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Xenia Tonesk. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Xenia Tonesk based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Xenia Tonesk. Xenia Tonesk is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

12 of 12 papers shown

1.

Mittman, Brian S., Xenia Tonesk, & Peter Jacobson. (1992). Implementing Clinical Practice Guidelines: Social Influence Strategies and Practitioner Behavior Change. QRB - Quality Review Bulletin. 18(12). 413–422. 295 indexed citations

2.

Hunt, D. Daniel, et al.. (1989). Types of problem students encountered by clinical teachers on clerkships. Medical Education. 23(1). 14–18. 31 indexed citations

3.

Plauché, Warren C., et al.. (1989). Two ways to assess problems of evaluating third- and fourth-year medical students. Academic Medicine. 64(8). 463–7. 3 indexed citations

4.

Tonesk, Xenia, et al.. (1987). An AAMC pilot study by 10 medical schools of clinical evaluation of students. Academic Medicine. 62(9). 707–18. 45 indexed citations

5.

Tonesk, Xenia. (1986). AAMC program to promote improved evaluation of students during clinical education. Academic Medicine. 61(9). 83–8. 11 indexed citations

6.

Tonesk, Xenia & Robin Buchanan. (1985). Datagram: Faculty Perceptions of Current Clinical Evaluation Systems.. Academic Medicine. 60(7). 1 indexed citations

7.

Tonesk, Xenia, et al.. (1985). Faculty perceptions of current clinical evaluation systems. Academic Medicine. 60(7). 573–6. 10 indexed citations

8.

Tonesk, Xenia, et al.. (1982). 1981-82 enrollment in U.S. medical schools. Academic Medicine. 57(6). 495–8. 2 indexed citations

9.

Tonesk, Xenia. (1979). The house officer as a teacher. Academic Medicine. 54(8). 613–6. 41 indexed citations

10.

Lorr, Maurice, et al.. (1976). Comparison Of Item-Level And Score-Level Typological Analysis: A Simulation Study. Multivariate Behavioral Research. 11(2). 135–145. 4 indexed citations

11.

Tonesk, Xenia, et al.. (1974). Vocational Interest Types of Men-In-General. Measurement and Evaluation in Guidance. 7(2). 74–78. 1 indexed citations

12.

Lorr, Maurice, et al.. (1973). The structure of values. Journal of Research in Personality. 7(2). 139–147. 8 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact