Xenia Tonesk
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health top 10%
- General Health Professions top 5%
- Family Practice top 5%
- Economics and Econometrics top 10%
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
- Co-authors
- Brian S. MittmanPeter JacobsonJan D. CarlineD. Daniel HuntMaurice LorrRobin BuchananRichard BuchananWarren C. Plauché
- Topics
- Innovations in Medical Education (5 papers)Medical Education and Admissions (3 papers)Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills (3 papers)
- Cited by
- Family PracticeGeneral Health ProfessionsPublic Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Xenia Tonesk
10 papers receiving 408 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 81
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 234
- General Health Professions 212
- Family Practice 76
- Economics and Econometrics 70
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 47
Countries citing papers authored by Xenia Tonesk
This map shows the geographic impact of Xenia Tonesk's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Xenia Tonesk with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Xenia Tonesk more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Xenia Tonesk
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Xenia Tonesk. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Xenia Tonesk. The network helps show where Xenia Tonesk may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Xenia Tonesk
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Xenia Tonesk. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Xenia Tonesk based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Xenia Tonesk. Xenia Tonesk is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 295 | |
| 2 | 31 | |
| 3 | 3 | |
| 4 | 45 | |
| 5 | 11 | |
| 6 | Datagram: Faculty Perceptions of Current Clinical Evaluation Systems. | 1 |
| 7 | 10 | |
| 8 | 2 | |
| 9 | 41 | |
| 10 | 4 | |
| 11 | 1 | |
| 12 | 8 |
About Xenia Tonesk
Xenia Tonesk is a scholar working on Family Practice, Emergency Medical Services and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 12 papers that have together received 452 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Innovations in Medical Education (5 papers), Medical Education and Admissions (3 papers) and Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Family Practice (76 citations), General Health Professions (212 citations) and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (234 citations). Xenia Tonesk has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Brian S. Mittman, Peter Jacobson, Jan D. Carline, D. Daniel Hunt, Maurice Lorr, Robin Buchanan, Richard Buchanan, Warren C. Plauché, Richard Vial and James B. Erdmann. Their work appears in journals such as Academic Medicine, Medical Education and Journal of Research in Personality.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.