Wolfgang Liebert

1.1k citations
28 papers · 746 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Wolfgang Liebert

24 papers receiving 653 citations

Peers

Wolfgang Liebert
Comparison fields: 5 of 121
  • Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 263
  • Algebra and Number Theory 73
  • Economics and Econometrics 181
  • Computer Networks and Communications 136
  • Geometry and Topology 46
Replace Don Chakerian with:
Don Chakerian United States
Tamás F. Móri Hungary
Pushpa N. Rathie Brazil
Michael Frame United States
Mohsen Pourahmadi United States
Gerald Kroisandt Germany
Roger S. Pinkham United States
James Stewart Canada
Ross Lee Finney United States
Frank A. Farris United States
Wolfgang Liebert relative to Don Chakerian United States Don Chakerian's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.6×
Don Chakerian · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Wolfgang Liebert

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Wolfgang Liebert's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Wolfgang Liebert with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Wolfgang Liebert more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Wolfgang Liebert

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Wolfgang Liebert. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Wolfgang Liebert. The network helps show where Wolfgang Liebert may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 15 scholars most cited alongside Wolfgang Liebert, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Wolfgang Liebert Line = papers co-authored together Wolfgang Liebert links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 28 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1989252
2 1991157
3 202183
4 197141
5 201034
6 199029
7 201023
8 201417
9 197414
10 202214
11 197213
12 20239
13 20139
14 19679
15 19678
16 19677
17 20137
18 19726
19 20065
20 20233

About Wolfgang Liebert

Wolfgang Liebert is a scholar working on Aerospace Engineering, Algebra and Number Theory, Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality, Materials Chemistry and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 28 papers that have together received 746 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Nuclear reactor physics and engineering (7 papers), Rings, Modules, and Algebras (5 papers), Nuclear Materials and Properties (4 papers), Intellectual Property and Patents (3 papers), Advanced Topics in Algebra (3 papers), Commutative Algebra and Its Applications (3 papers), Chaos control and synchronization (3 papers) and Nuclear and radioactivity studies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (263 citations), Algebra and Number Theory (73 citations), Economics and Econometrics (181 citations), Computer Networks and Communications (136 citations) and Geometry and Topology (46 citations). Wolfgang Liebert has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Austria and United States. Frequent co-authors include H. G. Schuster, Klaus Pawelzik, Jan C. Schmidt, N. Muellner, G. Pfister, M. Englert, Iris Kral, F. Fujara, Silke Aumann and Margret Engelhard. Their work appears in journals such as The Nonproliferation Review, Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society, Physics Letters A, Physical Review A and Journal of Nuclear Materials.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact