Celia Beckett
- Clinical Psychology top 0.5%
- Safety Research top 0.05%
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 5%
- Sociology and Political Science top 5%
- Education top 2%
- Co-authors
- Michael RutterJana KreppnerJenny CastleChristine GroothuesEdmund Sonuga‐BarkeThomas G. O’ConnorSuzanne StevensEmma Colvert
- Topics
- Child Welfare and Adoption (35 papers)Child Abuse and Trauma (13 papers)Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (11 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesBelgium
In The Last Decade
Celia Beckett
46 papers receiving 3.2k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 93
- Clinical Psychology 2.2k
- Safety Research 2.0k
- Cognitive Neuroscience 656
- Sociology and Political Science 529
- Education 468
Countries citing papers authored by Celia Beckett
This map shows the geographic impact of Celia Beckett's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Celia Beckett with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Celia Beckett more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Celia Beckett
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Celia Beckett. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Celia Beckett. The network helps show where Celia Beckett may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Celia Beckett
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Celia Beckett. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Celia Beckett based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Celia Beckett. Celia Beckett is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Deprivation-specific psychological patterns: Effects of institutional deprivation by the English and Romanian Adoptee Study Team | 5 |
| 2 | 40 | |
| 3 | 52 | |
| 4 | 11 | |
| 5 | 89 | |
| 6 | Policy and practice implications from the English and Romanian adoptees (ERA) study: forty five key questions | 6 |
| 7 | 12 | |
| 8 | 121 | |
| 9 | 190 | |
| 10 | 48 | |
| 11 | 4 | |
| 12 | 132 | |
| 13 | 144 | |
| 14 | 47 | |
| 15 | 179 | |
| 16 | 250 | |
| 17 | 239 | |
| 18 | 80 | |
| 19 | 13 | |
| 20 | 266 |
About Celia Beckett
Celia Beckett is a scholar working on Safety Research, Clinical Psychology and Demography, having authored 46 papers that have together received 3.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Child Welfare and Adoption (35 papers), Child Abuse and Trauma (13 papers) and Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (11 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Safety Research (2.0k citations), Clinical Psychology (2.2k citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (656 citations). Celia Beckett has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Belgium. Frequent co-authors include Michael Rutter, Jana Kreppner, Jenny Castle, Christine Groothues, Edmund Sonuga‐Barke, Thomas G. O’Connor, Suzanne Stevens, Emma Colvert, Amanda Hawkins and Diana Bredenkamp. Their work appears in journals such as Child Development, Developmental Psychology and Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.