Wolf‐Christian Saul

2.2k total citations
18 papers, 831 citations indexed

About

Wolf‐Christian Saul is a scholar working on Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Nature and Landscape Conservation and Ecology. According to data from OpenAlex, Wolf‐Christian Saul has authored 18 papers receiving a total of 831 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 9 papers in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, 8 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation and 7 papers in Ecology. Recurrent topics in Wolf‐Christian Saul's work include Plant and animal studies (9 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (7 papers) and Species Distribution and Climate Change (5 papers). Wolf‐Christian Saul is often cited by papers focused on Plant and animal studies (9 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (7 papers) and Species Distribution and Climate Change (5 papers). Wolf‐Christian Saul collaborates with scholars based in Germany, South Africa and Australia. Wolf‐Christian Saul's co-authors include Jonathan M. Jeschke, Tina Heger, Benjamin D. Hoffmann, Franck Courchamp, David M. Richardson, Ludwig Trepl, John R. Wilson, Jan Pergl, Philip E. Hulme and Helen E. Roy and has published in prestigious journals such as Nature, Trends in Ecology & Evolution and Ecology Letters.

In The Last Decade

Wolf‐Christian Saul

18 papers receiving 805 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Wolf‐Christian Saul Germany 13 442 339 284 157 145 18 831
Shyama Pagad New Zealand 10 369 0.8× 210 0.6× 201 0.7× 162 1.0× 142 1.0× 12 669
Sankarsan Roy India 4 666 1.5× 300 0.9× 174 0.6× 127 0.8× 195 1.3× 17 954
Matthew C. Hutchinson United States 15 421 1.0× 250 0.7× 258 0.9× 132 0.8× 53 0.4× 22 766
Anna Norberg Finland 11 452 1.0× 402 1.2× 276 1.0× 343 2.2× 177 1.2× 22 1.1k
Thomas Evans United Kingdom 13 609 1.4× 512 1.5× 283 1.0× 261 1.7× 181 1.2× 30 1.1k
Anouschka R. Hof Sweden 18 566 1.3× 244 0.7× 195 0.7× 353 2.2× 157 1.1× 47 970
Agata Mrugała Czechia 15 786 1.8× 366 1.1× 195 0.7× 124 0.8× 157 1.1× 24 1.2k
Melinda L. Moir Australia 20 393 0.9× 398 1.2× 523 1.8× 283 1.8× 244 1.7× 56 1.1k
Jan Klečka Czechia 16 323 0.7× 334 1.0× 522 1.8× 209 1.3× 186 1.3× 34 933
John I. Hammond United States 18 394 0.9× 305 0.9× 284 1.0× 213 1.4× 155 1.1× 29 1.1k

Countries citing papers authored by Wolf‐Christian Saul

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Wolf‐Christian Saul's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Wolf‐Christian Saul with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Wolf‐Christian Saul more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Wolf‐Christian Saul

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Wolf‐Christian Saul. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Wolf‐Christian Saul. The network helps show where Wolf‐Christian Saul may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Wolf‐Christian Saul

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Wolf‐Christian Saul. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Wolf‐Christian Saul based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Wolf‐Christian Saul. Wolf‐Christian Saul is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

18 of 18 papers shown
1.
Yannelli, Florencia A. & Wolf‐Christian Saul. (2020). The lockdown walk that inspired an experiment. Nature. 1 indexed citations
2.
Heger, Tina, Maud Bernard‐Verdier, Arthur Geßler, et al.. (2020). Clear Language for Ecosystem Management in the Anthropocene: A Reply to Bridgewater and Hemming. BioScience. 70(5). 374–376. 2 indexed citations
3.
Frost, Carol M., Warwick J. Allen, Franck Courchamp, et al.. (2019). Using Network Theory to Understand and Predict Biological Invasions. Trends in Ecology & Evolution. 34(9). 831–843. 63 indexed citations
4.
Pergl, Jan, Petr Pyšek, Franz Essl, et al.. (2019). Need for routine tracking of biological invasions. Conservation Biology. 34(5). 1311–1314. 47 indexed citations
5.
Latombe, Guillaume, Susan Canavan, Heidi Hirsch, et al.. (2019). A four‐component classification of uncertainties in biological invasions: implications for management. Ecosphere. 10(4). 37 indexed citations
6.
Ogden, Nicholas H., John R. Wilson, David M. Richardson, et al.. (2019). Emerging infectious diseases and biological invasions: a call for a One Health collaboration in science and management. Royal Society Open Science. 6(3). 181577–181577. 80 indexed citations
7.
Dick, Jaimie T. A., Mhairi E. Alexander, Anthony Ricciardi, et al.. (2017). Fictional responses from Vonesh et al.. Biological Invasions. 19(5). 1677–1678. 10 indexed citations
8.
Penk, Marcin R., Wolf‐Christian Saul, Jaimie T. A. Dick, et al.. (2017). A trophic interaction framework for identifying the invasive capacity of novel organisms. Methods in Ecology and Evolution. 8(12). 1786–1794. 17 indexed citations
9.
Dick, Jaimie T. A., Mhairi E. Alexander, Anthony Ricciardi, et al.. (2017). Functional responses can unify invasion ecology. Biological Invasions. 19(5). 1667–1672. 96 indexed citations
10.
Essl, Franz, Philip E. Hulme, Jonathan M. Jeschke, et al.. (2016). Scientific and Normative Foundations for the Valuation of Alien-Species Impacts: Thirteen Core Principles. BioScience. biw160–biw160. 47 indexed citations
11.
Kalinkat, Gregor, Juliano Sarmento Cabral, William Darwall, et al.. (2016). Flagship umbrella species needed for the conservation of overlooked aquatic biodiversity. Conservation Biology. 31(2). 481–485. 72 indexed citations
12.
Saul, Wolf‐Christian, Helen E. Roy, Olaf Booy, et al.. (2016). Assessing patterns in introduction pathways of alien species by linking major invasion data bases. Journal of Applied Ecology. 54(2). 657–669. 86 indexed citations
13.
Heger, Tina, Sylvia Haider, Wolf‐Christian Saul, & Jonathan M. Jeschke. (2015). Species from different taxonomic groups show similar invasion traits. 3. 3 indexed citations
14.
Saul, Wolf‐Christian & Jonathan M. Jeschke. (2015). Eco‐evolutionary experience in novel species interactions. Ecology Letters. 18(3). 236–245. 126 indexed citations
15.
Heger, Tina, Sylvia Haider, Wolf‐Christian Saul, & Jonathan M. Jeschke. (2015). Species from different taxonomic groups show similar invasion traits. Refubium (Universitätsbibliothek der Freien Universität Berlin). 4 indexed citations
16.
Saul, Wolf‐Christian, Jonathan M. Jeschke, & Tina Heger. (2013). The role of eco-evolutionary experience in invasion success. NeoBiota. 17. 57–74. 61 indexed citations
17.
Heger, Tina, Wolf‐Christian Saul, & Ludwig Trepl. (2013). What biological invasions ‘are’ is a matter of perspective. Journal for Nature Conservation. 21(2). 93–96. 36 indexed citations
18.
Hoffmann, Benjamin D. & Wolf‐Christian Saul. (2010). Yellow crazy ant (Anoplolepis gracilipes) invasions within undisturbed mainland Australian habitats: no support for biotic resistance hypothesis. Biological Invasions. 12(9). 3093–3108. 43 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026