Maud Bernard‐Verdier
- Nature and Landscape Conservation top 2%
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics top 2%
- Plant Science top 10%
- Ecology top 10%
- Ecological Modeling top 2%
- Co-authors
- Philip E. HulmeMarie‐Laure NavasÉric GarnierCyrille ViolleMark VellendAdeline FayolleJason M. TylianakisÍgnasi Bartomeus
- Topics
- Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (14 papers)Plant and animal studies (9 papers)Species Distribution and Climate Change (6 papers)
- Cited by
- Nature and Landscape ConservationEcological ModelingEcology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaPLoS ONEScientific Reports
- Partner nations
- GermanyNew ZealandSwitzerland
In The Last Decade
Maud Bernard‐Verdier
21 papers receiving 869 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 57
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 607
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 488
- Plant Science 242
- Ecology 229
- Ecological Modeling 210
Countries citing papers authored by Maud Bernard‐Verdier
This map shows the geographic impact of Maud Bernard‐Verdier's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Maud Bernard‐Verdier with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Maud Bernard‐Verdier more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Maud Bernard‐Verdier
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Maud Bernard‐Verdier. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Maud Bernard‐Verdier. The network helps show where Maud Bernard‐Verdier may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Maud Bernard‐Verdier
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Maud Bernard‐Verdier. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Maud Bernard‐Verdier based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Maud Bernard‐Verdier. Maud Bernard‐Verdier is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | 10 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 11 | |
| 5 | 6 | |
| 6 | 36 | |
| 7 | 19 | |
| 8 | 1 | |
| 9 | 23 | |
| 10 | 2 | |
| 11 | 26 | |
| 12 | 32 | |
| 13 | 21 | |
| 14 | 19 | |
| 15 | 29 | |
| 16 | 93 | |
| 17 | 147 | |
| 18 | 32 | |
| 19 | 11 | |
| 20 | 311 |
About Maud Bernard‐Verdier
Maud Bernard‐Verdier is a scholar working on Ecological Modeling, Nature and Landscape Conservation and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, having authored 21 papers that have together received 879 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (14 papers), Plant and animal studies (9 papers) and Species Distribution and Climate Change (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nature and Landscape Conservation (607 citations), Ecological Modeling (210 citations) and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (488 citations). Maud Bernard‐Verdier has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, New Zealand and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Philip E. Hulme, Marie‐Laure Navas, Éric Garnier, Cyrille Violle, Mark Vellend, Adeline Fayolle, Jason M. Tylianakis, Ígnasi Bartomeus, Dominique Gravel and Marcelo A. Aizen. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, PLoS ONE and Scientific Reports.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.