W.J. Curry
Impact in
-
- Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research
- Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology
- Aging top 10%
Papers in
-
- Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling 4
- Protein Hydrolysis and Bioactive Peptides 3
-
- Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology 8
- Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research 3
- Co-authors
- C.F. Johnston (8 shared papers)K. D. Buchanan (6 shared papers)C. Shaw (5 shared papers)L. Thim (3 shared papers)D.W. Halton (5 shared papers)Susan D. Arden (2 shared papers)N.G. Rutherford (2 shared papers)John C. Hutton (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- Regulatory Peptides (5 papers)The Journal of Comparative Neurology (1 paper)Histochemistry and Cell Biology (1 paper)Biochemical Journal (1 paper)Cell and Tissue Research (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomSwedenDenmark
In The Last Decade
W.J. Curry
17 papers receiving 463 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 70
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 248
- Aging 19
- Cell Biology 77
- Molecular Biology 250
- Ophthalmology 30
Countries citing papers authored by W.J. Curry
This map shows the geographic impact of W.J. Curry's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by W.J. Curry with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites W.J. Curry more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by W.J. Curry
This network shows the impact of papers produced by W.J. Curry. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by W.J. Curry. The network helps show where W.J. Curry may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside W.J. Curry, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1991 | 69 | |
| 2 | 1992 | 68 | |
| 3 | Isolation of retinal progenitor and stem cells from the porcine eye. | 2007 | 67 |
| 4 | 1994 | 63 | |
| 5 | 1994 | 51 | |
| 6 | 1989 | 45 | |
| 7 | 1997 | 32 | |
| 8 | 1994 | 27 | |
| 9 | 2011 | 17 | |
| 10 | 2002 | 14 | |
| 11 | 1993 | 7 | |
| 12 | 1996 | 4 | |
| 13 | Porcine Neural Retinal Proteomics | 2003 | 2 |
| 14 | 2004 | 2 | |
| 15 | 1994 | 2 | |
| 16 | 1987 | 2 | |
| 17 | 1991 | 1 |
About W.J. Curry
W.J. Curry is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Cell Biology, Surgery and Ophthalmology, having authored 17 papers that have together received 473 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology (8 papers), Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling (4 papers), Protein Hydrolysis and Bioactive Peptides (3 papers), Cellular transport and secretion (3 papers), Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research (3 papers), Pancreatic function and diabetes (2 papers), Insect Utilization and Effects (2 papers) and Glaucoma and retinal disorders (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (248 citations), Aging (19 citations), Cell Biology (77 citations), Molecular Biology (250 citations) and Ophthalmology (30 citations). W.J. Curry has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Sweden and Denmark. Frequent co-authors include C.F. Johnston, K. D. Buchanan, C. Shaw, L. Thim, D.W. Halton, Susan D. Arden, N.G. Rutherford, John C. Hutton, Aaron G. Maule and Xiaohong Zhang. Their work appears in journals such as Regulatory Peptides, The Journal of Comparative Neurology, Histochemistry and Cell Biology, Biochemical Journal and Cell and Tissue Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.