Winifred W. Doane
- Molecular Biology
- Biotechnology top 2%
- Insect Science top 5%
- Genetics top 10%
- Plant Science top 10%
- Co-authors
- Irene AbrahamRobert M. GemmillRachel NormanP E SchwartzAndrew G. ClarkLydia LemaireGünter BrönnerThomas Ciossek
- Topics
- Enzyme Production and Characterization (13 papers)Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research (8 papers)Insect Resistance and Genetics (8 papers)
- Cited by
- AgingBiotechnologyInsect Science
- Partner nations
- United StatesDenmarkGermany
In The Last Decade
Winifred W. Doane
29 papers receiving 856 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 69
- Molecular Biology 493
- Biotechnology 309
- Insect Science 199
- Genetics 196
- Plant Science 179
Countries citing papers authored by Winifred W. Doane
This map shows the geographic impact of Winifred W. Doane's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Winifred W. Doane with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Winifred W. Doane more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Winifred W. Doane
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Winifred W. Doane. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Winifred W. Doane. The network helps show where Winifred W. Doane may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Winifred W. Doane
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Winifred W. Doane. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Winifred W. Doane based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Winifred W. Doane. Winifred W. Doane is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 8 | |
| 2 | 65 | |
| 3 | 14 | |
| 4 | 4 | |
| 5 | 4 | |
| 6 | Mutation analysis of the cystic fibrosis transmembrane regulator gene in Native American populations of the southwest. | 16 |
| 7 | 1 | |
| 8 | 12 | |
| 9 | 19 | |
| 10 | Molecular genetics of a three-gene cluster in the Amy region of Drosophila. | 6 |
| 11 | 8 | |
| 12 | 15 | |
| 13 | 51 | |
| 14 | 9 | |
| 15 | 0 | |
| 16 | 93 | |
| 17 | 65 | |
| 18 | 2 | |
| 19 | 52 | |
| 20 | 36 |
About Winifred W. Doane
Winifred W. Doane is a scholar working on Aging, Biotechnology and Insect Science, having authored 30 papers that have together received 892 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Enzyme Production and Characterization (13 papers), Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research (8 papers) and Insect Resistance and Genetics (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Aging (63 citations), Biotechnology (309 citations) and Insect Science (199 citations). Winifred W. Doane has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Denmark and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Irene Abraham, Robert M. Gemmill, Rachel Norman, P E Schwartz, Andrew G. Clark, Lydia Lemaire, Günter Brönner, Thomas Ciossek, R. Fritsch and Donald B. Thompson. Their work appears in journals such as Science, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences and Nucleic Acids Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.