Winifred W. Doane
- Aging top 5%
- Genetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model Organisms 3
- Biotechnology top 2%
- Enzyme Production and Characterization 13
- Insect Science top 5%
- Aquatic Science top 5%
-
- Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research 8
-
- Insect Resistance and Genetics 8
- Studies on Chitinases and Chitosanases 5
-
- Invertebrate Immune Response Mechanisms 4
-
- Phytase and its Applications 3
-
- Animal Genetics and Reproduction 3
- Co-authors
- Irene AbrahamRobert M. GemmillRachel NormanP E SchwartzAndrew G. ClarkLydia LemaireGünter BrönnerThomas Ciossek
- Cited by
- AgingBiotechnologyInsect Science
- Journals
- Science (3 papers)Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (1 paper)Nucleic Acids Research (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesDenmarkGermany
In The Last Decade
Winifred W. Doane
29 papers receiving 856 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 69
- Aging 63
- Biotechnology 309
- Insect Science 199
- Aquatic Science 99
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 166
Countries citing papers authored by Winifred W. Doane
This map shows the geographic impact of Winifred W. Doane's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Winifred W. Doane with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Winifred W. Doane more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Winifred W. Doane
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Winifred W. Doane. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Winifred W. Doane. The network helps show where Winifred W. Doane may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Winifred W. Doane, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2008 | 8 | |
| 2 | 2003 | 65 | |
| 3 | 1992 | 14 | |
| 4 | 1992 | 4 | |
| 5 | 1992 | 4 | |
| 6 | Mutation analysis of the cystic fibrosis transmembrane regulator gene in Native American populations of the southwest. | 1992 | 16 |
| 7 | 1992 | 1 | |
| 8 | 1990 | 12 | |
| 9 | 1990 | 19 | |
| 10 | Molecular genetics of a three-gene cluster in the Amy region of Drosophila. | 1990 | 6 |
| 11 | 1989 | 8 | |
| 12 | 1986 | 15 | |
| 13 | 1985 | 51 | |
| 14 | 1984 | 9 | |
| 15 | 1972 | 0 | |
| 16 | 1969 | 93 | |
| 17 | 1967 | 65 | |
| 18 | 1961 | 2 | |
| 19 | 1961 | 52 | |
| 20 | 1960 | 36 |
About Winifred W. Doane
Winifred W. Doane is a scholar working on Aging, Biotechnology and Insect Science, having authored 30 papers that have together received 892 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Enzyme Production and Characterization (13 papers), Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research (8 papers), Insect Resistance and Genetics (8 papers), Studies on Chitinases and Chitosanases (5 papers), Invertebrate Immune Response Mechanisms (4 papers), Genetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model Organisms (3 papers), Phytase and its Applications (3 papers) and Animal Genetics and Reproduction (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Aging (63 citations), Biotechnology (309 citations) and Insect Science (199 citations). Winifred W. Doane has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Denmark and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Irene Abraham, Robert M. Gemmill, Rachel Norman, P E Schwartz, Andrew G. Clark, Lydia Lemaire, Günter Brönner, Thomas Ciossek, R. Fritsch and Donald B. Thompson. Their work appears in journals such as Science, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences and Nucleic Acids Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.