Friedrich Fauser

2.8k total citations · 1 hit paper
16 papers, 1.9k citations indexed

About

Friedrich Fauser is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Plant Science and Genetics. According to data from OpenAlex, Friedrich Fauser has authored 16 papers receiving a total of 1.9k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 16 papers in Molecular Biology, 11 papers in Plant Science and 1 paper in Genetics. Recurrent topics in Friedrich Fauser's work include CRISPR and Genetic Engineering (12 papers), Chromosomal and Genetic Variations (9 papers) and Plant tissue culture and regeneration (5 papers). Friedrich Fauser is often cited by papers focused on CRISPR and Genetic Engineering (12 papers), Chromosomal and Genetic Variations (9 papers) and Plant tissue culture and regeneration (5 papers). Friedrich Fauser collaborates with scholars based in Germany, United States and Switzerland. Friedrich Fauser's co-authors include Holger Puchta, Simon Schiml, Alexander Knoll, Michael Pacher, Christian Biesgen, Rocı́o Sánchez-Fernández, Martin C. Jonikas, Josep Vilarrasa‐Blasi, Robert E. Jinkerson and Xiaobo Li and has published in prestigious journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Nature Communications and Nature Genetics.

In The Last Decade

Friedrich Fauser

16 papers receiving 1.8k citations

Hit Papers

Both CRISPR/Cas‐based nucleases and nickases can be used ... 2014 2026 2018 2022 2014 100 200 300 400 500

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Friedrich Fauser Germany 12 1.7k 1.2k 220 164 118 16 1.9k
Jae‐Young Yun South Korea 11 1.0k 0.6× 726 0.6× 43 0.2× 79 0.5× 33 0.3× 15 1.2k
Douglas E. Pyott United Kingdom 7 537 0.3× 475 0.4× 99 0.5× 41 0.3× 42 0.4× 8 682
Max G. Schubert United States 10 539 0.3× 303 0.3× 203 0.9× 126 0.8× 46 0.4× 14 892
Zhiyun Gong China 22 979 0.6× 1.4k 1.1× 49 0.2× 356 2.2× 39 0.3× 71 1.7k
Didier G. Schaefer Switzerland 20 1.5k 0.9× 1.8k 1.5× 43 0.2× 56 0.3× 118 1.0× 26 2.2k
Sylvia de Pater Netherlands 19 937 0.6× 847 0.7× 54 0.2× 157 1.0× 131 1.1× 32 1.3k
Yaping Fu China 22 1.0k 0.6× 1.6k 1.4× 38 0.2× 322 2.0× 58 0.5× 55 1.9k
Joachim Forner Germany 23 1.6k 1.0× 1.3k 1.1× 23 0.1× 70 0.4× 53 0.4× 30 1.9k
Su‐Chiung Fang Taiwan 13 756 0.4× 675 0.6× 194 0.9× 39 0.2× 62 0.5× 24 1.0k
William Gordon‐Kamm United States 26 2.0k 1.2× 1.9k 1.6× 34 0.2× 169 1.0× 639 5.4× 40 2.5k

Countries citing papers authored by Friedrich Fauser

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Friedrich Fauser's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Friedrich Fauser with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Friedrich Fauser more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Friedrich Fauser

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Friedrich Fauser. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Friedrich Fauser. The network helps show where Friedrich Fauser may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Friedrich Fauser

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Friedrich Fauser. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Friedrich Fauser based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Friedrich Fauser. Friedrich Fauser is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

16 of 16 papers shown
1.
Vilarrasa‐Blasi, Josep, Tamara Vellosillo, Robert E. Jinkerson, et al.. (2024). Multi-omics analysis of green lineage osmotic stress pathways unveils crucial roles of different cellular compartments. Nature Communications. 15(1). 5988–5988. 5 indexed citations
2.
Atkinson, Nicky, Lianyong Wang, Simona Eicke, et al.. (2024). SAGA1 and MITH1 produce matrix-traversing membranes in the CO2-fixing pyrenoid. Nature Plants. 10(12). 2038–2051. 6 indexed citations
3.
Fauser, Friedrich, Sebastian Arangundy‐Franklin, Jessica E. Davis, et al.. (2024). Compact zinc finger architecture utilizing toxin-derived cytidine deaminases for highly efficient base editing in human cells. Nature Communications. 15(1). 1181–1181. 3 indexed citations
4.
Li, Xiaobo, Weronika Patena, Friedrich Fauser, et al.. (2019). A genome-wide algal mutant library and functional screen identifies genes required for eukaryotic photosynthesis. Nature Genetics. 51(4). 627–635. 187 indexed citations
5.
Miller, Jeffrey C., Deepak P. Patil, Danny F. Xia, et al.. (2019). Enhancing gene editing specificity by attenuating DNA cleavage kinetics. Nature Biotechnology. 37(8). 945–952. 40 indexed citations
6.
Schiml, Simon, Friedrich Fauser, & Holger Puchta. (2017). CRISPR/Cas-Mediated In Planta Gene Targeting. Methods in molecular biology. 1610. 3–11. 8 indexed citations
7.
Vu, Giang T. H., Hieu X. Cao, Friedrich Fauser, et al.. (2017). Endogenous sequence patterns predispose the repair modes of CRISPR/Cas9‐induced DNA double‐stranded breaks in Arabidopsis thaliana. The Plant Journal. 92(1). 57–67. 27 indexed citations
8.
Schiml, Simon, Friedrich Fauser, & Holger Puchta. (2016). Repair of adjacent single-strand breaks is often accompanied by the formation of tandem sequence duplications in plant genomes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 113(26). 7266–7271. 49 indexed citations
9.
Schiml, Simon, Friedrich Fauser, & Holger Puchta. (2016). CRISPR/Cas-Mediated Site-Specific Mutagenesis in Arabidopsis thaliana Using Cas9 Nucleases and Paired Nickases. Methods in molecular biology. 111–122. 25 indexed citations
10.
Schiml, Simon, et al.. (2015). Highly efficient heritable plant genome engineering using Cas9 orthologues from Streptococcus thermophilus and Staphylococcus aureus. The Plant Journal. 84(6). 1295–1305. 188 indexed citations
11.
Knoll, Alexander, Friedrich Fauser, & Holger Puchta. (2014). DNA recombination in somatic plant cells: mechanisms and evolutionary consequences. Chromosome Research. 22(2). 191–201. 77 indexed citations
12.
Schiml, Simon, Friedrich Fauser, & Holger Puchta. (2014). The CRISPR/Cas system can be used as nuclease for in planta gene targeting and as paired nickases for directed mutagenesis in Arabidopsis resulting in heritable progeny. The Plant Journal. 80(6). 1139–1150. 251 indexed citations
13.
Fauser, Friedrich, Simon Schiml, & Holger Puchta. (2014). Both CRISPR/Cas‐based nucleases and nickases can be used efficiently for genome engineering in Arabidopsis thaliana. The Plant Journal. 79(2). 348–359. 544 indexed citations breakdown →
14.
Puchta, Holger & Friedrich Fauser. (2013). Gene targeting in plants: 25 years later. The International Journal of Developmental Biology. 57(6-7-8). 629–637. 112 indexed citations
15.
Puchta, Holger & Friedrich Fauser. (2013). Synthetic nucleases for genome engineering in plants: prospects for a bright future. The Plant Journal. 78(5). 727–741. 175 indexed citations
16.
Fauser, Friedrich, et al.. (2012). In planta gene targeting. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 109(19). 7535–7540. 160 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026